Justia Georgia Supreme Court Opinion Summaries
Articles Posted in Constitutional Law
Griffin v. Georgia
Rufus Griffin appealed his convictions for the 2016 malice murder of Kerry Freeman and related offenses, contending, among other things, that the trial court made certain evidentiary errors and that trial counsel rendered constitutionally ineffective assistance. After review, the Georgia Supreme Court found no reversible error and affirmed. View "Griffin v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Thomas v. Georgia
Drexton Thomas appealed his convictions for malice murder and other offenses in connection with the shooting death of Jeffrey Douglas, Sr., and the aggravated assault of Jeffrey Douglas, Jr. (“Junior”). He argued: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions as a matter of federal due process; (2) the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a new trial as the “thirteenth juror;” (3) the trial court abused its discretion in denying Thomas’ motion for a mistrial based on a courtroom outburst; (4) his inculpatory custodial statement was obtained in violation of his Miranda rights; (5) his trial counsel was ineffective; and (6) he was entitled to a new trial on the basis of cumulative prejudice. After review, the Georgia Supreme Court found no reversible error and affirmed. View "Thomas v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Dukes v. Georgia
Damarcus Dukes was convicted by jury of malice murder and related offenses in connection with crimes committed against Demarius Denham, Dankevion Chatman, and Uzamoake Moh. On appeal, Dukes claimed the trial court erred in three ways. Dukes was charged with multiple counts of the same crime - i.e., possession of a firearm by a first offender probationer. “And, while this would normally trigger a ‘unit of prosecution’ question,” the Georgia Supreme Court agreed with Dukes that the State’s failure to make the timeframe of the handgun possessions material allegations within the indictment caused Dukes to be improperly convicted and sentenced for the identical crime twice. With respect to his two convictions and sentences for possession of a firearm by a first offender probationer, the Supreme Court vacated these convictions and remanded for the trial court to conviction and resentence Dukes on only one of those counts. Judgment was affirmed in all other respects. View "Dukes v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Redding v. Georgia
Julian Redding was convicted of malice murder and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony in connection with the 2015 shooting death of Prince Varner. He appealed, asserting three errors in the trial court’s jury instructions and ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Finding no reversible error, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed Redding’s convictions. View "Redding v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Pope v. Georgia
Chauncey Pope was convicted by jury of malice murder, possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in connection with the 2014 shooting death of Derrick Brooks. On appeal, Pope’s sole contention is that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to request a pre-trial immunity hearing. The Georgia Supreme Court concluded that Pope’s trial counsel was not constitutionally deficient and affirmed Pope’s convictions. View "Pope v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Felts v. Georgia
William Felts was convicted by jury of malice murder and other offenses in connection with the 2007 stabbing deaths of Delarlonva Mattox, Jr., and Chrisondra Kimble. Felts appealed, arguing that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his convictions. After review, the Georgia Supreme Court found no reversible error and affirmed. View "Felts v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Matthews v. Georgia
Freeman Matthews was convicted by jury of malice murder, battery, and possession of a knife during the commission of a crime in connection with the 2009 stabbing death of Adrianne Young and also found him guilty of financial credit card theft and obstruction of an officer. On appeal, Matthews challenged the sufficiency of the evidence and contended the trial court erred in admitting his custodial statement and excluding evidence that pointed to a third- party suspect. Matthews also argued he received ineffective assistance of counsel. After review, the Georgia Supreme Court found no reversible error and affirmed. View "Matthews v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Sinkfield v. Georgia
Charmon Sinkfield was convicted of malice murder and other crimes in connection with the 2009 shooting death of Vernon Forrest. On appeal, Sinkfield contended the trial court erred when it denied his pretrial challenge to Fulton County’s master jury list and that the “death qualification” process resulted in a jury that violated his fair cross-section rights under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Seeing no reversible error, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed. View "Sinkfield v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Waller v. Georgia
Appellant Derain Waller was convicted of felony murder and other crimes in connection with the 2016 shooting death of Demonde Dicks, Jr. On appeal, Appellant contended the evidence was legally insufficient to support his convictions generally and his conviction for armed robbery specifically, and that the trial court erred in sentencing him on the armed robbery and felony murder counts. The Georgia Supreme Court vacated Appellant’s conviction for armed robbery because that conviction should have merged into the felony murder count for sentencing purposed. Otherwise, the Supreme Court found no other error and affirmed in all other respects. View "Waller v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
McClain v. Georgia
Letisha McClain appealed a trial court’s denial of her motion to withdraw her guilty pleas to felony murder and three counts of aggravated assault. She claimed the trial court erred in denying her motion because withdrawal of her pleas was necessary to correct a manifest injustice. The Georgia Supreme Court found McClain showed no obvious abuse of discretion in the trial court’s denial of her motion to withdraw her guilty pleas, so it affirmed. View "McClain v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law