Justia Georgia Supreme Court Opinion Summaries
Articles Posted in Constitutional Law
Gaddy v. Georgia
William Gaddy was convicted of felony murder and related crimes in connection with the death of Addisyn Sanders, the two- year-old daughter of Gaddy’s girlfriend, Tiffany Harris. Gaddy generally watched Addisyn while Harris was at work during the day. Gaddy, Harris, and Addisyn moved in with Gaddy’s grandmother. Gaddy’s ten-year-old brother, C. F., who often visited, was playing video games in one of the home’s bedrooms while Gaddy and Addisyn watched television in the living room. C. F. heard Addisyn crying while she said “no” and “stop” just before there were three thumps that sounded like a head banging against a wall. Then, C. F. saw Gaddy carry Addisyn’s limp body to another bedroom and leave her there. On appeal, Gaddy argued the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress his custodial statement. After review of the trial court record, the Georgia Supreme Court found no reversible error and affirmed Gaddy's convictions. View "Gaddy v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Volkova v. Georgia
Liubov Volkova appealed her conviction for the murder of her husband, Jordan Whitson. Volkova called police to inform them her husband had been shot. When police arrived, Volkova led them to Whitson’s body, which was lying at the bottom of a set of stairs. One shell casing was found near the body, and there was blood on Whitson’s hands and blood spatter up the stairs. Whitson had been shot through his right cheek, and the bullet lodged in his head, leading to his death. The handgun that caused Whitson’s death was found on a table in the master bedroom, where Volkova had placed it. On appeal, Volkova contended the trial court erred by failing to properly instruct the jury on how to consider a particular statement she made to police and that her trial counsel provided constitutionally ineffective assistance. Finding no reversible error, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed Volkova's conviction. View "Volkova v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
McKelvey v. Georgia
Appellant Sacorey McKelvey was convicted of murder and other crimes in connection with the shooting death of Corey Owens. On appeal, McKelvey contended: (1) the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his convictions; (2) the trial court erred by admitting into evidence his 2009 convictions for terroristic threats; (3) the trial court erred in striking two potential jurors for cause; and (4) that his trial counsel rendered constitutionally ineffective assistance by failing to call two alibi witnesses. Finding no reversible error, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed McKelvey's convictions. View "McKelvey v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Pearson v. Georgia
Appellant Gregory Pearson was convicted by jury on: five counts of armed robbery; two counts of burglary; one count of aggravated assault; and six counts of possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony in connection with robberies in two motel rooms in Valdosta, Georgia. He appealed, arguing: (1) his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to object to evidence of three witnesses’ identification of Appellant at a roadside “showup;” (2) the trial court erred and his counsel was ineffective relating to the admission into evidence a surveillance video, because the video was authenticated by his accomplice, LaQuita Frazier, and Frazier identified him on the video; and (3) the lack of a transcript of voir dire, opening statements, and closing arguments violated his constitutional right to due process. Finding no merit to any of these claims, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed his convictions. View "Pearson v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Strickland v. Georgia
Jesse Strickland was convicted by jury of malice murder and armed robbery in connection with the death of Arthur Westberry. On appeal, Strickland contended: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdicts; and (2) the trial court erred in denying his motion for a new trial because a juror lied during voir dire about her knowledge of the parties, facts, and witnesses to the case. Finding no reversible error, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed Strickland's convictions. View "Strickland v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Finney v. Georgia
Appellant Benjamin Finney was convicted of felony murder and two firearm crimes based on the 2008 fatal shooting Gwendolyn Cole, the mother of one of Appellant’s rivals. On appeal, Appellant argued, among other things, that the trial court erred: (1) by admitting hearsay from an accomplice; (2) by failing to give a jury instruction on the accomplice-corroboration requirement; and (3) by admitting evidence of Appellant’s involvement in two prior shootings. After review, the Georgia Supreme Court agreed the trial court erred in these ways, and because the cumulative effect of the errors likely affected the outcome of Appellant’s trial, his convictions were reversed. View "Finney v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Butler v. Georgia
Demarco Butler and Antonio Avery were tried jointly by jury and convicted of murder and other crimes in connection with a shooting incident that killed Jordan Collins and wounded his brother, Chad. Butler appealed, contending the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions, and that the trial court erred when it admitted expert testimony about gang activity and about Butler’s participation in a gang. In his separate appeal, Avery contended the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions, and that the trial court erred when it admitted a certain part of a recorded police interview. Finding no error in any of these enumerations, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's judgments in both cases. View "Butler v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Jones v. Georgia
Delaljujuan Jones was tried by jury and convicted of murder and other crimes in connection with a shooting that killed Stanley Hill and wounded three others. Jones appealed, contending: (1) the evidence presented at his trial was insufficient to sustain three of his convictions; (2) the trial court erred when it denied his request to charge the jury on the defense of justification; and (3) that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel when his trial counsel failed to present evidence that Hill and others at the scene of the shooting were members of a gang. Finding no reversible error, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed Jones' convictions. View "Jones v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Gialenios v. Georgia
Robert Gialenios was convicted by jury in 2019 of malice murder and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony arising out of the shooting death of Bryan Overseth, the husband of Gialenios’ mistress. His amended motion for new trial was denied, and he appealed, asserting seven enumerations of error. Finding no reversible error, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed Gialenios' convictions. View "Gialenios v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Harrison v. Georgia
Kevin Harrison was convicted by jury of murder and other crimes in connection with the shooting death of his wife, Heather Harrison. In the months leading up to the shooting, Heather had confided in multiple friends and family members that she was unhappy in her marriage; that Harrison was jealous, possessive, and controlling; and that she intended to move out of the couple’s home and seek a divorce. During that time, Harrison, who was aware of Heather’s intentions, contacted many of these same people to ask for advice on how to prevent Heather from leaving him. These witnesses described Harrison as being “broken-hearted” and “in a panic” about the prospect of Heather’s leaving; one witness testified that Harrison would call or text him for advice up to 30 times a day. Several witnesses testified that, on February 27, Heather planned to tell Harrison she was ending the relationship. In the early morning hours between February 27 and February 28, a concerned friend who spoke to Heather on the phone, arrived at the Harrison home to find police had cordoned off the Harrison home; Heather died at the hospital. On appeal, Harrison contended the State failed to carry its burden to disprove that the shooting was accidental, and that the trial court erred in refusing to give a requested jury instruction and in admitting certain other-acts evidence. Finding no reversible error, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed Harrison's convictions. View "Harrison v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law