Justia Georgia Supreme Court Opinion Summaries
Articles Posted in Constitutional Law
Chapman v. Georgia
Appellant Lawrence Chapman was convicted of malice murder, aggravated battery, and other crimes in connection with the June 25, 2015 shooting of Rosalyn Chapman and Odetta Hampton. He argued his convictions should have been reversed because the trial court plainly erred in providing an incomplete instruction on how the jury was to consider evidence of his good character. Finding no reversible error, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed. View "Chapman v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Jackson v. Georgia
David Jackson was convicted by jury of malice murder, aggravated assault, and various other offenses in connection with the stabbing death of John Thomas. On appeal, Jackson argued: the trial court committed plain error by giving an incorrect jury instruction on self-defense; the trial court erred in its re-charge to the jury on voluntary manslaughter; and his trial counsel was ineffective. Finding no reversible error, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed. View "Jackson v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Welch v. Georgia
In October 2012, a jury found Dennis Welch guilty of malice murder and other crimes in connection with the shooting death of Jamie Wright. Welch appealed, contending the trial court erred by failing to give a jury instruction on involuntary manslaughter and that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for malice murder. Finding no reversible error, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed. View "Welch v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Collins v. Georgia
Appellant Casey Collins was convicted of malice murder and other crimes in connection with the strangling death of his 78-yearold grandfather, Edward Smith. On appeal, he argued his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to investigate and present evidence that he was sexually abused by Smith and by failing to withdraw as counsel after Appellant filed a bar complaint alleging ethical violations. The Georgia Supreme Court concluded these contentions were meritless, and affirmed. View "Collins v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Lewis v. Georgia
Freddie Lewis was convicted of malice murder, rape, and burglary in connection with the 1991 death of Evelyn Wise. Lewis argued the trial court erred: (1) by denying his motion for a directed verdict; (2) by denying his motion in limine to exclude DNA evidence based on inadequate chain of custody; (3) by failing to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine the admissibility of DNA evidence; (4) in admitting the statements of a deceased witness; and (5) by sentencing him on the aggravated assault, burglary, and rape counts because the statutes of limitations for those counts had expired prior to trial. The Georgia Supreme Court determined the trial court committed no error, because the evidence was sufficient to support convictions on the crimes charged, and the DNA evidence, as well as the out-of-court statements by the deceased witness, were properly admitted. Finally, the statute of limitations period was tolled while Lewis’s identity was unknown, and so the trial court properly sentenced Lewis. View "Lewis v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Abney v. Georgia
Dwayne Abney appealed his convictions for multiple counts of malice murder and other crimes related to the 2015 shooting deaths of Kiana Marshall, Isaiah Martin, and Alexis Kitchens. Abney argues that the evidence was insufficient to convict him of fleeing or attempting to elude a police officer. He also argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial when the State elicited testimony that violated the court’s ruling on a motion in limine and in overruling his objections to improper bolstering. Finding no reversible error, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed. View "Abney v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Cheeves v. Georgia
Kendrick Cheeves was convicted by jury of malice murder and various other offenses in connection with the shooting death of Quinton Henderson. On appeal, Cheeves contended only that the trial court erred by failing to charge the jury on involuntary manslaughter. Finding no reversible error, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed. View "Cheeves v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Victoria v. Georgia
Jerome Victoria appealed after a jury convicted him of felony murder and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He argued he received ineffective assistance of counsel regarding a potential plea deal offer. The Georgia Supreme Court found that although the 20-year plea deal offered by the State was less severe than the life sentence imposed after trial, and Victoria testified that he would have taken that deal, Victoria made no showing that “the prosecution would not have withdrawn it in light of intervening circumstances [and] . . . that the court would have accepted its terms.” Accordingly, the Supreme Court affirmed the conviction. View "Victoria v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Derrico v. Georgia
Appellant Mark Derrico was convicted of aggressive driving, reckless conduct, and failure to signal lane change or turn in connection with a road rage incident. Derrico raised several challenges on appeal, including constitutional challenges. Finding no reversible error, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed. View "Derrico v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Cain v. Georgia
A jury found appellant Terry Joe Cain guilty of malice murder and other crimes in connection with the shooting death of Matthew Mobley and the assault of Gregory Johnson. He appealed, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion for directed verdict, finding that his pretrial statement to law enforcement was voluntarily given, and denying his motion for mistrial. Upon consideration, the Georgia Supreme Court concluded that Cain’s claims were meritless. However, because the trial court erred in sentencing, the case was remanded for resentencing. View "Cain v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law