Justia Georgia Supreme Court Opinion Summaries
Articles Posted in Criminal Law
Wilson v. Georgia
Timothy Wilson, Jr. was convicted by jury of child molestation, statutory rape, and two counts of incest involving his 13-year-old stepdaughter, B. O., and the Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of conviction. Wilson petitioned the Georgia Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari, which was granted to consider “[w]hether the trial court erred in concluding that evidence of alleged prior offenses of child molestation was admissible under OCGA 24-4-414.” The Court determined the Court of Appeals' analysis of the trial court's decision to admit Wilson's prior offenses of child molestation was flawed, but concluded the judgment was correct. Accordingly, judgment was affirmed. View "Wilson v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Kinslow v. Georgia
Jereno Kinslow's felony conviction for computer trespass was premised on evidence that Kinslow altered his employer’s computer network settings so that e-mail messages meant for Kinslow’s boss would also be copied and forwarded to Kinslow’s personal e-mail account. The Court of Appeals affirmed Kinslow’s conviction, and the Georgia Supreme Court granted Kinslow’s petition for certiorari, posing the question of whether Kinslow’s conduct constituted a violation of OCGA 16-9-93 (b)(2). The Court found that although the statute in general was extremely broad, the portion of (b)(2) on which the State exclusively relied did not reach Kinslow’s conduct. Accordingly, the Supreme Court concluded the evidence presented at Kinslow’s trial was insufficient to support his conviction under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979), and thus reversed. View "Kinslow v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Seals v. Georgia
This case presented the question of whether defendants in criminal cases could have their cases dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because verdicts were rendered or sentences imposed on less than all counts of an indictment or accusation, or one or more counts were “dead- docketed.” The Georgia Supreme Court concluded it did: dead-docketing, while a common and longstanding practice in Georgia courts, had almost no statutory authority and none that would allow different treatment here. "And precedent from our Court of Appeals has for decades made clear that when a count is dead-docketed, the case remains pending in the trial court." Such a case cannot be appealed as a final judgment under OCGA 5-6-34 (a) (1); instead, it required a certificate of immediate review, which Demarquis Seals did not seek. The Supreme Court therefore affirmed the Court of Appeals’ dismissal of his appeal. View "Seals v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Young v. Georgia
Rodney Renia Young was convicted by jury for the murder of Gary Jones and related crimes. The jury declined in its guilt/innocence phase verdict to find him “mentally retarded.” At the conclusion of the sentencing phase, the jury found multiple statutory aggravating circumstances and sentenced Young to death for the murder. Finding no reversible error, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed Young’s convictions. View "Young v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Tyler v. Georgia
Charles Tyler was convicted by jury of felony murder, armed robbery, and other crimes in connection with the shooting death of David Fulkrod and theft of copper from a recycling facility. On appeal, Tyler challenged the sufficiency of the evidence as to all of his convictions. Because the evidence was sufficient to support each conviction, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed his convictions. View "Tyler v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Walker v. Georgia
Appellant O’Shaye Walker was convicted of felony murder, armed robbery, attempt to purchase marijuana, and a firearm offense in connection with the shooting death of Taquahn Jackson. He argued on appeal the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury on misdemeanor possession of marijuana as a lesser-included offense and by giving an overbroad instruction on the attempt to purchase marijuana charge. He also contended his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to object to the admission of certain statements made by Appellant and a detective during Appellant’s recorded interview. Finding no reversible error, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed. View "Walker v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Thomas v. Georgia
Tony Thomas was convicted by jury of felony murder in the shooting death of Dominique Boyer; malice murder in the shooting deaths of Veondus Dennis and Antwan Wheeler; aggravated assault against Fredrick Foster, Raheem Zeigler, Kevyn Courtney, and Tiojah Johnson; and criminal gang activity. On appeal, Thomas contended the trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on impeachment by a prior felony conviction, and in denying his motion for a new trial based on the State’s failure to disclose evidence that two witnesses had felony convictions. Thomas also contended he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Finding no reversible error, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed. View "Thomas v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Holmes v. Georgia
Dequan Holmes appealed his convictions for felony murder, aggravated assault, and two counts of possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime for the shooting death of Javares Alston and the non-fatal shooting of Danielle Willingham. He argued on appeal that the evidence was insufficient to convict him and that the trial court committed plain error when it charged the jury to “consider with great care and caution” Holmes’s out-of-court statements. Holmes, a juvenile at the time the crime was committed, also challenged his sentence of life without parole, arguing that it violated the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution as interpreted by the United States Supreme Court. The Georgia Supreme Court held the evidence was sufficient to convict Holmes and that any error in the trial court’s instruction to the jury did not amount to plain error because the instruction did not affect the outcome of his trial. The Supreme Court also concluded Holmes’ sentence of life without parole was not prohibited by United States Supreme Court precedent, especially in the light of that Court’s recent decision in Jones v. Mississippi, ____ U.S. ___ (141 S.Ct 1307 (2021)). View "Holmes v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Maxwell v. Georgia
Appellants Zonnique Maxwell and Tyquarius Washington appealed a trial court’s partial denial of their respective motions for autrefois convict and pleas of procedural double jeopardy based on OCGA sections 16-1-7 and 16-1-8. Jaheim Morris was taken to Memorial Medical Center in Savannah with a gunshot wound to the head; he died from that wound. At the hospital, police learned that Morris had been driven to the hospital in a private car, which had a bullet hole in one of its doors. The occupants of this car (other than Morris) were Maxwell, Washington, and two others. Police searched these individuals for weapons and recovered a handgun from Maxwell and a revolver and a pistol from Washington. Maxwell would be arrested for possessing a handgun by a person under age 18 in state court; after further investigation into Morris’ shooting, Maxwell would be indicted at superior court for felony murder, aggravated assault, weapons possession charges, and violating the Street Gang Terrorism and Prevention Act. She negotiated a guilty plea in state court to the firearm charge, for which she was sentenced to 12 months. Maxwell then moved to dismiss the superior court charges against her on double jeopardy grounds. Similar to Maxwell, Washington was initially arrested at the hospital and charged with misdemeanor carrying weapons without a license in state court. Washington was later indicted in superior court on charges that largely mirrored Maxwell’s. Washington entered a negotiated guilty plea on the firearm charge in state court and was sentenced to 12 months of probation. Thereafter, Washington moved to adopt Maxwell’s procedural double jeopardy motion. The trial court granted Appellants’ motions with regard to the weapons charges as procedurally barred by procedural double jeopardy, but denied the motions with respect to all remaining superior court charges. Appellants challenged that ruling on nearly identical arguments. The Georgia Supreme Court determined that for the majority of the superior court counts, the trial court properly denied Appellants’ motions. However, with respect to one count of street gang activity, against Maxwell and two counts against Washington, the trial court should have dismissed these counts as they were explicitly premised in the indictment on the counts that were dismissed. View "Maxwell v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Davenport v. Georgia
Deanthony Davenport was convicted by jury of malice murder and other crimes in connection with the 2014 shooting death of Willie Thomas. On appeal, Davenport argued: (1) the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to sustain his convictions; (2) his trial counsel rendered constitutionally ineffective assistance by failing to request a curative instruction or move for a mistrial based on hearsay evidence; and (3) the trial court erred by refusing to charge the jury on voluntary manslaughter. Finding no reversible error, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed Davenport’s convictions. View "Davenport v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law