Justia Georgia Supreme Court Opinion Summaries

Esco Hill was convicted by jury of malice murder and other crimes relating to the stabbing death of Alford Morris in 2014. On appeal, Hill argued the trial court committed reversible error by requiring him to be visibly shackled for the duration of his six-day trial. After review of the trial court record, the Georgia Supreme Court concurred this was reversible error, consequently, reversed judgment of conviction. Because the Court concluded the evidence at trial was sufficient to sustain Hill's conviction, the State could re-try him. The Court did not address Hill's remaining enumerations of error, "as they are not likely to recur in the event of a retrial." View "Hill v. Georgia" on Justia Law

Rupert Clark was convicted by jury for the malice murder of his wife, Rosemarie Lebert-Clark. He was also convicted of possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. On appeal, he argued he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel, and that the trial court erred in admitting certain evidence, violated the continuing witness rule by sending out with the deliberating jury printouts of text messages, and by failing to instruct the jury that a defendant’s uncorroborated confession was not alone sufficient to warrant a conviction. Finding no reversible error after reviewing the trial court record, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed conviction. View "Clarke v. Georgia" on Justia Law

Derrick Styles was convicted by jury of felony murder and other crimes in connection with the shooting death of Alberto Lumens and the armed robbery fo Juan Lumens Garcia. On appeal, Styles contended the trial court erred in admitting into evidence a recording of an inculpatory telephone conversation between himself and a witness. He also argued his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to an allegedly improper comment by the prosecutor during closing argument. Finding no merit to these contentions, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed conviction. View "Styles v. Georgia" on Justia Law

Lavaris Dawson was convicted by jury of felony murder and other crimes in connection with the shooting death of Mamadou Camara. On appeal, Dawson challenged the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his convictions, and argued the trial court erred in admitting Dawson’s statements to a detective during an interview because those statements were impermissibly induced by a hope of benefit, and that Dawson was denied his due process right to a timely appeal. After review, the Georgia Supreme Court disagreed and affirmed Dawson’s convictions. View "Dawson v. Georgia" on Justia Law

Renita Collins was tried for murder along with co-defendant Michael Stallworth. Collins appealed her convictions for murder and possession of a firearm while in commission of a felony in connection with the shooting death of Keith Jacobs. On appeal. Collins contended she was denied a fair trial due to juror misconduct, the trial court abused its discretion by not allowing her to subpoena juror testimony to show that misconduct had occurred, and the trial court abused its discretion when it failed to excuse a prospective juror for cause. Finding no reversible error, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed conviction. View "Collins v. Georgia" on Justia Law

Javis Whitehead was convicted by jury of murder and other crimes in connection with the shooting death of Dominique Larry. On appeal, Whitehead challenged the sufficiency of the evidence presented to rebut his claim of self-defense and to convict him for murder beyond a reasonable doubt. He also argued the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress his custodial statement, and in refusing to excuse for cause the District Attorney from the panel of prospective jurors prior to the conclusion of voir dire. Finding no merit to these contentions, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed conviction. View "Whitehead v. Georgia" on Justia Law

Larry Rosser was convicted by jury of malice murder and other crimes in connection with the death of Alexis Vereen. On appeal, Rosser challenged the sufficiency of the evidence presented against him at trial, and argued the trial court erred by not granting his motion for a mistrial, and by allowing the State to introduce a portion of Rosser's custodial statement to law enforcement. In addition, he argued he received constitutionally ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Finding no reversible error after reviewing the trial court record, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed conviction. View "Rosser v. Georgia" on Justia Law

Brandon Carter was convicted by jury of malice murder and two firearm offenses in connection with the shooting death of Terrance Baker. On appeal, Carter contended the trial court erred by admitting certain hearsay statements into evidence and by violating his constitutional right to be present during his trial. Finding no reversible error, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed conviction. View "Carter v. Georgia" on Justia Law

Jimmy Evans was convicted by jury for murder and other crimes relating to the 2006 deaths of Tavoris Calhoun and Dezmon Thomas. On appeal, Evans argued that because he was visibly intoxicated at the time he made statements to law enforcement and consented to a search of his home and person, the statements and consent were involuntarily given and the trial court should have granted his motion for new trial on this ground. Furthermore, Evans argued that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to suppress at trial on the same basis. Because Evans failed to show error or ineffective assistance of counsel, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed his conviction. View "Evans v. Georgia" on Justia Law

Kenneth Howard was tried by jury and convicted of the murder of Emily Ann Smith Newbegin. Howard appealed, contending that the evidence was legally insufficient to sustain his conviction. Upon its review of the record and briefs, the Georgia Supreme Court found no merit in Howard's claim of error, and affirmed. View "Howard v. Georgia" on Justia Law