Justia Georgia Supreme Court Opinion Summaries

Jeremiah Douglas was convicted of murder and aggravated assault for pushing his former girlfriend, Leea Raines, out of a truck, resulting in her death. The incident occurred on November 5, 2021. Douglas was indicted on multiple charges, including malice murder, felony murder, aggravated assault, and making false statements. A jury found him guilty on all counts, and he was sentenced to life without parole for malice murder, with additional consecutive sentences for aggravated assault and making false statements. Douglas's defense was that Raines committed suicide by jumping out of the truck due to narcotic withdrawal.The trial court denied Douglas's motion for a new trial, which he filed and amended through new counsel. Douglas appealed, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions and that his trial counsel was ineffective for not requesting a jury charge on voluntary manslaughter. The trial court's denial of the motion for a new trial was upheld, and the case was submitted for a decision on the briefs.The Supreme Court of Georgia reviewed the case and found that the evidence was sufficient to support Douglas's convictions for malice murder and aggravated assault. The court noted that eyewitness testimony and Douglas's own admissions provided direct evidence of his guilt. The court also concluded that Douglas's trial counsel was not ineffective for pursuing an "all or nothing" defense strategy, as it was consistent with Douglas's claim that Raines committed suicide.However, the court identified a merger error, as the aggravated assault conviction should have merged into the malice murder conviction. Consequently, the court vacated the aggravated assault conviction and remanded the case for resentencing on the false statement conviction, which had been ordered to run consecutively to the now-vacated aggravated assault sentence. The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed the judgment in part, vacated it in part, and remanded the case for resentencing. View "DOUGLAS v. THE STATE" on Justia Law

The case involves Dereckson Clark, who was found guilty of malice murder and other crimes related to the shooting death of Alton Cotton. The incident occurred on February 22, 2020, when Clark and Cotton had a verbal altercation. Despite being urged to walk away, Clark retrieved a revolver from his car, approached Cotton, and shot him in the head. Cotton died from the gunshot wound, and no weapon was found near him. Witnesses testified that Cotton did not threaten Clark or have anything in his hands before being shot.A Peach County grand jury indicted Clark in November 2020. At his June 2021 trial, Clark was found guilty on all counts and sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole for malice murder, plus a consecutive five-year term for possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. Clark's motion for a new trial was denied in February 2023. He filed a pro se notice of appeal, which the trial court recognized as valid, preserving his right to appeal.The Supreme Court of Georgia reviewed the case. Clark argued that the trial court erred in its jury instructions about the grand jury process and in excluding his prior testimony from a pretrial immunity hearing. He also claimed ineffective assistance of counsel for not seeking the removal of a juror with a medical condition. The court found no plain error in the jury instructions and deemed any error in excluding Clark's prior testimony as harmless, given the overwhelming evidence of his guilt. The court also ruled that Clark's counsel made a reasonable strategic decision regarding the juror. Consequently, the Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed the trial court's judgment. View "CLARK v. THE STATE" on Justia Law

The appellant was convicted of felony murder, armed robbery, and other crimes related to the shooting death of Sean Turner and the robbery of Turner and Stephen Thomas. The crimes occurred on December 4, 2015, and the appellant was indicted on multiple counts, including malice murder, felony murder, armed robbery, aggravated assault, hijacking a motor vehicle, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. The jury found the appellant guilty on all counts except malice murder and two counts of aggravated assault. The trial court sentenced the appellant to life in prison for felony murder, along with additional concurrent and consecutive sentences for other charges.The appellant filed a motion for a new trial, which was denied by the trial court. The appellant then appealed to the Supreme Court of Georgia, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions, that the trial court erred in several respects, and that his trial counsel was ineffective.The Supreme Court of Georgia reviewed the case and found that the evidence was sufficient to support the appellant's convictions for felony murder and armed robbery. The court also found that the trial court did not commit plain error by failing to charge the jury on accomplice corroboration, as the accomplice's testimony was corroborated by other evidence. Additionally, the court held that the appellant's Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses was not violated, as the co-indictee who refused to testify was never brought before the jury. The court also found that any error in admitting testimony about the appellant's alleged gang involvement was harmless.Regarding the claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, the court found that the appellant's counsel was not deficient in failing to file a general demurrer, request an accomplice corroboration charge, renew an objection to the trial court's refusal to instruct the jury on voluntary manslaughter, or move to exclude evidence of a handgun. The court concluded that the appellant did not suffer cumulative prejudice from the alleged errors and affirmed the convictions. View "FLOYD v. THE STATE" on Justia Law

Darrell Dexter Scott was convicted in 2017 for the felony murder of Darrius Ware at Johnson State Prison. Scott argued that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, the trial court made several errors, and he was denied effective assistance of counsel. Ware was killed on September 23, 2014, and Scott was indicted in December 2014. In March 2017, Scott was re-indicted for multiple charges, including malice murder and felony murder. The jury found Scott guilty of one count each of felony murder and aggravated assault, and he was sentenced to life in prison without parole.Scott filed a pro se motion for a new trial, later retaining Laura Hogue for his appeal. After several changes in representation and procedural delays, Scott's appeal was eventually docketed in the Supreme Court of Georgia. The court reviewed the case based on the briefs submitted.The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed Scott's conviction. The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction, as a rational jury could have found Scott guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The court also found no abuse of discretion in admitting Ware's unredacted death certificate and allowing it to go back with the jury, even if it was assumed to be an error, as it was deemed harmless. The court ruled that the trial court did not err in allowing the State to cross-examine Scott about the veracity of other witnesses, as the questions were permissible under the circumstances. Additionally, the court found that Scott's trial counsel made a strategic decision not to request jury instructions on lesser offenses, which was not patently unreasonable. Finally, the court rejected Scott's cumulative error claim, as there was only one assumed error, which was harmless. View "SCOTT v. THE STATE" on Justia Law

Susan Embert was arrested in February 2015 for charges related to the shooting death of her husband, William “Jake” Embert. She was indicted on June 24, 2015, on five counts, including malice murder and aggravated assault. Her trial took place in December 2019, nearly five years after her arrest, and she was found guilty on all counts. However, over three years later, it was discovered that one of the jurors was a convicted felon, making him ineligible for jury service. Embert raised this issue in her third amended motion for a new trial, which the trial court granted based on the juror’s ineligibility.The trial court then dismissed the case on constitutional speedy trial grounds, determining that the December 2019 trial was void due to the ineligible juror, and thus did not count for the speedy trial calculation. The court found that the delay from Embert’s arrest to the present exceeded nine years, violating her constitutional right to a speedy trial. The trial court attributed most of the delay to Embert but concluded that the presumptive prejudice from the nine-year delay warranted dismissal.The Supreme Court of Georgia reviewed the case and held that the trial court erred in finding the December 2019 trial void for speedy trial purposes. The court clarified that a trial with an ineligible juror results in a voidable verdict, not a void trial. Consequently, the December 2019 trial should be considered for the speedy trial analysis. The Supreme Court vacated the trial court’s dismissal order and remanded the case for reconsideration of the speedy trial analysis, instructing the trial court to reweigh the factors using the correct factual and legal analysis. View "THE STATE v. EMBERT" on Justia Law

Kierra Dates filed a lawsuit against the City of Atlanta after her minor son was injured by a falling tree branch on City property. Dates sent an initial ante litem notice to the City within the required time frame, claiming a nonspecific amount of loss. Over a year later, she sent a supplemental notice claiming a loss of $1,000,000. The trial court dismissed her complaint for failing to comply with the municipal ante litem notice statute, and Dates appealed.The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's decision, holding that Dates's first notice was not specific enough and that her second notice was untimely. The court also ruled that the tolling provision for actions brought by minors did not apply to municipal ante litem notices.The Supreme Court of Georgia reviewed the case to determine whether the minor tolling provision applies to the municipal ante litem notice statute. The Court concluded that the tolling provision does not apply. The Court reasoned that the municipal ante litem notice statute is a condition precedent to bringing a lawsuit, not a statute of limitations, and therefore is not subject to tolling under the minor tolling provision. The Court affirmed the Court of Appeals' decision, holding that Dates's supplemental notice was untimely and not tolled by the minor tolling provision. View "DATES v. CITY OF ATLANTA" on Justia Law

Ray Eugene Pollard was convicted of malice murder for the shooting death of Jonathon McAfee. The incident occurred on October 3, 2020, and Pollard was indicted on multiple charges, including malice murder and aggravated assault. During the trial, evidence showed that Pollard had a history of threatening behavior towards McAfee and had been at the scene of the shooting. Pollard's vehicle was found with damage consistent with evidence collected near the crime scene. Additionally, Pollard's inconsistent statements to police and his admission of being at the scene further implicated him.The Baldwin County trial court entered a nolle prosequi for one count and a jury found Pollard guilty of the remaining charges. Pollard was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole for malice murder. His conviction for aggravated assault merged with the malice murder conviction for sentencing purposes. Pollard filed a motion for a new trial, which was denied by the trial court.The Supreme Court of Georgia reviewed the case on appeal. Pollard argued that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the admission of cell-site location information (CSLI) obtained without a search warrant. The court assumed, without deciding, that the trial counsel's performance was deficient. However, the court found that Pollard did not demonstrate that the outcome of the trial would have been different without the CSLI evidence. The court noted that the other evidence against Pollard was strong, including his presence at the scene, physical evidence, and his threatening behavior. Consequently, the court affirmed Pollard's conviction, concluding that he did not suffer prejudice from the alleged deficiency in his counsel's performance. View "POLLARD v. THE STATE" on Justia Law

In January 2008, Arthur James Mosley, an elderly farmer, was found dead in his home with multiple sharp-force injuries. Mosley's wallet was later discovered in a neighbor's yard, partially burned. DNA testing advancements between 2008 and 2013 revealed a partial DNA profile consistent with Timothy French on Mosley's pants. French was subsequently indicted for malice murder, felony murder, and armed robbery in April 2014. After a mistrial in April 2015, French was retried in June 2015 and found guilty on all counts. He was sentenced to life in prison for malice murder and a concurrent life sentence for armed robbery, with the felony murder count vacated by law.French filed a motion for a new trial, which was denied by the trial court in August 2024. He then appealed to the Supreme Court of Georgia, arguing that the trial court erred in four respects.The Supreme Court of Georgia reviewed the case and found no error in the trial court's decisions. The court held that the trial court correctly rejected French's Batson challenge to the State’s peremptory strike of a black potential juror, as the prosecutor provided a race-neutral explanation based on the juror's employment with the Division of Family and Children Services. The court also upheld the trial court's denial of French's motion for funds to retain a defense expert, noting that French failed to provide specific information necessary for the trial court to assess the need for assistance. Additionally, the court deemed French's third and fourth claims of error abandoned due to his failure to provide substantive argument or legal authority in support of those claims. Consequently, the Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed the trial court's judgment. View "FRENCH v. THE STATE" on Justia Law

Carey Jackson was found guilty by a DeKalb County jury of felony murder, aggravated assault, first-degree criminal damage to property, and a violation of the Street Gang Terrorism and Prevention Act in connection with the shooting death of Arnold Leslie and the assaults of seven other individuals. The crimes occurred on April 6, 2020, and Jackson was indicted on December 1, 2020. The jury found Jackson not guilty of malice murder and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony but guilty of the remaining counts. Jackson was sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole for felony murder, along with additional consecutive and concurrent prison terms for the other charges.Jackson filed a motion for a new trial on January 18, 2022, which was amended through new counsel on April 9, 2024. The trial court denied the motion on June 26, 2024. Jackson then filed a notice of appeal on July 16, 2024, and the case was docketed in the Supreme Court of Georgia for the term beginning in December 2024.The Supreme Court of Georgia reviewed Jackson's claim that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to a jury instruction related to the Street Gang Act. Jackson argued that the instruction created a constitutionally impermissible mandatory presumption. The court found that the instruction did not create a mandatory presumption or shift the burden of proof to the defendant. Instead, it explained the meaning of the phrase "further the interests of the gang" and required the jury to find beyond a reasonable doubt that the crime committed was the sort of crime the gang engaged in. Consequently, the court held that Jackson's trial counsel was not deficient for failing to object to the instruction and affirmed the trial court's decision. View "JACKSON v. THE STATE" on Justia Law

Thomas Stephens, a 20-year-old, sought to carry a handgun in public beyond the limited ways allowed under Georgia law. Georgia law permits individuals aged 18 to 21 to possess long guns and carry them in public, and to possess handguns in specific locations such as their home, car, or place of business. However, carrying a handgun in public generally requires the individual to be 21 or older unless they have received military weapons training. Stephens challenged the statute that restricts public carry of handguns to those over 21, arguing it violates the Georgia Constitution.Stephens initially filed the lawsuit along with Georgia Second Amendment, Inc., which later withdrew its appeal, leaving Stephens as the sole appellant. The trial court dismissed Stephens's complaint, upholding the statute. The court reasoned that the statute was a reasonable safety measure and did not constitute a complete prohibition on the right to bear arms, citing longstanding precedent that allows the General Assembly to regulate the manner of bearing arms.The Supreme Court of Georgia reviewed the case and affirmed the lower court's decision. The court held that the statutory scheme did not violate the Georgia Constitution. The court emphasized that state statutes are presumed constitutional and that Stephens failed to meet the heavy burden of proving otherwise. The court also noted that the consistent construction of the right to bear arms under Georgia law, which allows the General Assembly to regulate the manner of bearing arms, has been upheld for over a century. Stephens's argument to reconsider and overrule this precedent was not compelling, and his constitutional challenge to the statute failed. View "STEPHENS v. STATE OF GEORGIA" on Justia Law