Justia Georgia Supreme Court Opinion Summaries

Malik Nunnally was convicted of malice murder and other crimes related to the death of Maya Mitchell. On December 30, 2018, Mitchell left her boyfriend Xavier Lamar's home to meet Nunnally. The next morning, her body was found in Glen Emerald Park with a gunshot wound to the head. Evidence showed that Mitchell had been in contact with a phone number ending in -2170, which was in Nunnally's possession. Text messages indicated that Mitchell was meeting Nunnally to buy marijuana. Nunnally's girlfriend testified that he left her apartment that night with a gun. Cell-site data placed Nunnally's phone near the crime scene. Mitchell's car was later found abandoned, and Nunnally's internet search history showed searches related to the murder.The DeKalb County Superior Court held a jury trial from August 26, 2021, to September 2, 2021. The court granted a directed verdict for Nunnally on the armed robbery charge but the jury found him guilty on the remaining counts. Nunnally was sentenced to life in prison for malice murder, with additional concurrent and consecutive sentences for firearm possession charges. The felony murder count was vacated by operation of law, and the aggravated assault count merged into the malice murder count for sentencing. Nunnally's motion for a new trial was denied by the trial court on December 8, 2023.The Supreme Court of Georgia reviewed the case and affirmed the convictions. The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions under constitutional due process and Georgia statutory law. The court also found no error in the trial court's jury instruction on party to a crime, as there was at least slight evidence supporting the theory that Nunnally was involved in the events leading to Mitchell's murder. The judgment was affirmed, and all justices concurred. View "Nunnally v. State" on Justia Law

Rendell Russell was convicted in 2022 for malice murder and related crimes after killing Gregory James with a machete. The incident occurred on October 27, 2020, following Russell's breakup with his girlfriend, Kenisha Shepherd. On the night of the crime, Russell entered Shepherd's apartment uninvited, where James, Shepherd's new boyfriend, was staying. Despite being asked to leave, Russell returned with a machete, confronted James, and ultimately attacked him, resulting in James's death from multiple sharp and blunt force injuries.A Cobb County grand jury indicted Russell on several charges, including malice murder, felony murder, and aggravated assault. The trial court bifurcated the firearm possession count. In March 2022, a jury found Russell guilty on all counts. The trial court sentenced him to life without parole for malice murder and additional concurrent and consecutive terms for other charges. Russell's motion for a new trial was denied by the trial court in December 2023, leading to this appeal.The Supreme Court of Georgia reviewed the case and affirmed the lower court's decision. The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's verdict, rejecting Russell's claim of self-defense. The court found that Russell was the aggressor and that the State had disproved his justification defense beyond a reasonable doubt. Additionally, the court rejected Russell's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, concluding that his trial counsel's decision not to file a pretrial motion for immunity was a reasonable strategic choice. The court determined that there was little chance such a motion would have been successful given the evidence against Russell. View "Russell v. State" on Justia Law

In January 2013, Demon Wilson was involved in the shooting death of Desmond Kinnemore in Rockmart, Georgia. Witnesses Cindy and John Bowman saw Kinnemore approach a red sedan, heard a gunshot, and saw Kinnemore fall into a ditch. The red sedan then drove away. Police later found Kinnemore dead with a gunshot wound to the head and a .223 caliber shell casing nearby. Wilson was stopped by police driving a red Cadillac matching the description given by the Bowmans. Further investigation revealed .223 caliber cartridges and a spent shell casing in Wilson’s car, which matched the casing found at the crime scene. Wilson was indicted and convicted of malice murder and related crimes.Wilson was tried in the Superior Court of Polk County, where the jury found him guilty on all counts. The trial court sentenced him to life in prison without the possibility of parole for malice murder, merging the other counts for sentencing purposes. Wilson’s motion for a new trial was denied by the trial court.The Supreme Court of Georgia reviewed the case. Wilson argued that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction and that the trial court erred by not allowing evidence of other suspects. The Supreme Court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction, as it excluded every reasonable hypothesis except Wilson’s guilt. The court also found that any error in excluding evidence of other suspects was harmless, given the strong evidence against Wilson. The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed the lower court’s judgment, upholding Wilson’s conviction and sentence. View "Wilson v. State" on Justia Law

In a special election for Chatham County Commissioner, Jeffry L. Miller, an elector, filed a pro se petition against several Chatham County election officials and candidate Malinda Jane Scott Hodge. Miller contested the election results, arguing that Hodge was ineligible due to residency requirements and her former position on the Chatham County Board of Elections. He also claimed that the use of a QR code on the ballot was illegal and that the election officials failed to provide proper notice of redistricting.The trial court held an evidentiary hearing but did not issue a ruling before the runoff election. Miller did not call any witnesses or present new evidence at the hearing. The runoff election proceeded, and the trial court later dismissed Miller's petition, ruling that Hodge was eligible and that the special election results were valid. The court also found that Miller's petition was moot due to the subsequent runoff election. Miller appealed to the Supreme Court of Georgia.The Supreme Court of Georgia dismissed the appeal, citing long-standing precedent that election challenges must be resolved with dispatch before a subsequent election occurs. The court emphasized that Miller failed to seek an expedited ruling or a stay of the runoff election. The court clarified that while the occurrence of a subsequent election does not necessarily moot an election contest, prudential reasons and statutory framework require swift resolution of such disputes. The court concluded that Miller's delay and failure to utilize available procedures warranted dismissal of the appeal. View "Miller v. Hodge" on Justia Law

The case revolves around a medical malpractice and hospital negligence claim filed by Jami Lynn Golden against Floyd Healthcare Management, Inc. Golden visited Floyd Emergency Care Center in July 2016, complaining of abdominal pain, fever, chills, and nausea. Despite a computer-generated sepsis alert, Golden was discharged with instructions to follow up in two to three days. Her condition worsened, and she was later admitted to Redmond Regional Medical Center Intensive Care Unit in septic shock. As a result, Golden suffered necrosis that required the amputation of parts of her fingers and toes.Floyd Healthcare Management moved to dismiss Golden's claim, arguing that the five-year medical malpractice statute of repose had expired. The trial court denied the motion, concluding that the repose statute was tolled by the "Order Declaring Statewide Judicial Emergency" issued in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the Court of Appeals reversed this decision, holding that the repose statute was not tolled by the emergency order.The Supreme Court of Georgia reversed the Court of Appeals' decision. It held that the emergency order did indeed toll the repose statute, and that there was no impediment in the federal or Georgia Constitutions for the statute of repose to be tolled. The court concluded that Golden's claims were not time-barred, and that the application of the emergency order to toll the repose statute did not violate Floyd Healthcare Management's due process rights. View "GOLDEN v. FLOYD HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, INC." on Justia Law

In January 2020, Nelaunte Grant was convicted of felony murder related to the shooting death of Shawntray Grant in June 2018. Nelaunte Grant, along with several co-indictees, was charged in a 108-count indictment for crimes related to Shawntray’s death and other unrelated crimes. However, Nelaunte Grant was only charged with felony murder predicated on armed robbery and armed robbery, not the additional crimes. After a joint trial, she was found guilty of felony murder and armed robbery and sentenced to life in prison. She filed a motion for a new trial, arguing that the evidence presented was insufficient to support her conviction for felony murder.The trial court denied the motion for a new trial. Nelaunte Grant appealed, contending that the evidence was insufficient to support her conviction for felony murder, both as a matter of constitutional due process and under Georgia statutory law. She argued that the State failed to prove she was a party to the crimes and that the evidence showed only her mere association with a co-defendant, Osha Dunham, who was directly responsible for Shawntray’s death.The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed the lower court's decision. The court found that the evidence, while not overwhelming, was sufficient to support Nelaunte Grant’s conviction. The court noted that the jury could reasonably infer that Nelaunte Grant advised Dunham about Shawntray’s winnings and whereabouts, hatched a plan with Dunham to rob Shawntray, and then attempted to conceal any evidence of her participation in the crimes. The court also rejected Nelaunte Grant’s argument that the State failed to exclude every reasonable hypothesis other than her guilt, finding that the jury was authorized to reject as unreasonable the hypothesis that she "innocently" communicated information about Shawntray’s winnings and whereabouts to Dunham and later made false statements to investigators out of fear. View "GRANT v. THE STATE" on Justia Law

Edward Tavarez was convicted for malice murder and other offenses related to the shooting of Travis Ridley during a supposed drug deal. The indictment charged Tavarez with malice murder, three counts of felony murder, criminal solicitation, two counts of armed robbery, aggravated assault, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. Tavarez was found guilty of all charges against him and was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole for malice murder, among other sentences for the remaining charges.Tavarez appealed his conviction, arguing that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to object to hearsay testimony by a detective that bolstered the account of a key witness. He also argued that the trial court erred by conducting the trial while his legs were shackled, forcing him to choose between not participating in bench conferences or the jury seeing him in these restraints.The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed the lower court's decision. The court concluded that Tavarez failed to show that any deficient performance of counsel in failing to object to the detective’s testimony prejudiced his defense. The court also found that Tavarez failed to preserve his claim about the shackling itself, and he has not shown that he was excluded from any particular bench conference at which he had a right to be present. View "TAVAREZ v. THE STATE" on Justia Law

The case involves an appeal from an in rem civil-asset-forfeiture proceeding against over $1 million held in various bank accounts, real property, and other property. The State alleges that the property was used, intended for use, or constituted the proceeds derived from the commission of numerous crimes related to the theft, purchase, and sale of catalytic converters and other regulated metal property. The appellants, Garrett Smith, Stacey Smith, SmithCo Recycling, LLC, and SmithCo Transfer, LLC, claimed to be the owners of the seized property and moved to dismiss the complaint.The appellants argued that the trial court had failed to timely hold a bench trial or order a continuance, in violation of OCGA § 9-16-12 (f), and that the State had failed to allege the essential elements of a crime, in violation of OCGA § 916-12 (a). The trial court denied the motion to dismiss, and the Court of Appeals affirmed.The Supreme Court of Georgia granted certiorari to address three questions. The court concluded that the appellants are estopped from arguing on appeal that the date SmithCo Transfer filed its answer was not equivalent to the date it was served with the complaint. The court affirmed the trial court’s denial of appellants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to timely hold a bench trial or continue the trial under OCGA § 9-16-12 (f). The court also held that the trial court and the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the second amended complaint adequately alleged the essential elements of theft by taking, as required by OCGA § 9-16-12 (a). The court reversed the portion of the Court of Appeals’ opinion holding otherwise. The case was remanded for further proceedings. View "SMITH v. THE STATE" on Justia Law

In October 2022, Starship Enterprises of Atlanta, Inc. filed a lawsuit against Gwinnett County, challenging a 2015 county ordinance regulating "Adult Establishments." Starship, which owns two stores in Gwinnett County, had previously filed a similar lawsuit in 2017, which it voluntarily dismissed. The county, however, maintained its counterclaim, and the trial court granted the county a permanent injunction restraining Starship from "regularly making more than 100 sexual devices available for sale" at each of its locations. Starship appealed the decision, but the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s grant of a permanent injunction against Starship.In the second lawsuit, Starship invoked a constitutional amendment that waives sovereign immunity for certain lawsuits, including lawsuits against a county for declaratory judgment and related injunctive relief. The trial court dismissed Starship’s lawsuit, holding that it was barred by sovereign immunity and by res judicata. Starship appealed to the Court of Appeals, which transferred the case to the Supreme Court of Georgia due to the novel constitutional question involved.The Supreme Court of Georgia concluded that although the constitutional waiver of sovereign immunity applied to Starship’s lawsuit, the suit was barred by res judicata. The court found that Starship's lawsuit sought relief from the county's prospective acts of enforcement, which will occur after January 1, 2021, and therefore the county’s sovereign immunity was waived under the constitutional amendment. However, the court also found that the lawsuit was barred by res judicata because the constitutional matters Starship now sought to raise could have been raised in the previous lawsuit. Therefore, the court affirmed the trial court’s order dismissing the lawsuit. View "STARSHIP ENTERPRISES OF ATLANTA, INC. v. GWINNETT COUNTY" on Justia Law

Dallas McCabe and Akhemu Dunston were convicted for felony murder and criminal attempt to sell marijuana in connection with the shooting death of Joseph Jackson. The crimes occurred on July 16, 2019, and the two were indicted on March 10, 2021, for malice murder, three counts of felony murder, and one count each of criminal attempt to commit robbery by force, criminal attempt to sell marijuana, and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. After a jury trial, McCabe and Dunston were found guilty on all counts except malice murder and aggravated assault. They were each sentenced to life in prison for felony murder and a concurrent five-year prison term for criminal attempt to sell marijuana.McCabe and Dunston appealed their convictions, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the jury’s verdicts and that the trial court erred by denying their motion for mistrial based on juror misconduct. McCabe separately contended that the trial court erred by denying his request to strike jurors for misconduct and that trial counsel rendered constitutionally ineffective assistance. Dunston separately contended that the trial court erred in failing to charge the jury more fully on proximate cause and in failing to sever his trial from McCabe’s. The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed the convictions. View "DUNSTON v. THE STATE" on Justia Law