Justia Georgia Supreme Court Opinion Summaries
Bridges v. Georgia
Appellant Arleshia Bridges appealed her convictions for malice murder and related crimes in connection with the 2010 shooting death of Anthony Rankins, Jr. On appeal, Bridges argued the trial court erred in denying her motion for a new trial based on the general grounds and in striking three prospective jurors. for cause. After review of the trial court record, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed. View "Bridges v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Jones v. Georgia
Reginald Jones appealed his convictions for malice murder and related crimes in connection with the 2017 death of his girlfriend Faith Bittinger and her unborn child. On appeal. Jones argued: (1) the trial evidence was insufficient to establish he killed Bittinger with malice aforethought; and (2) trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance for calling Jones’ neighbor as a character witness, because in doing so, the State was then permitted to introduce prejudicial character witness. Finding no reversible error, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed. View "Jones v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Walker v. Georgia
Shaun Walker was convicted by jury of malice murder and related crimes in connection with the 2017 shooting death of Antonio Ferguson. On appeal, Walker argued the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions. Finding no reversible error, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed Walker’s convictions. View "Walker v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Dugar v. Georgia
Rita Dugar was convicted for shooting Jon Townley at her ex-boyfriend’s home. She claimed she attempted to fire a warning shot because the boyfriend and Townley had been fighting. On appeal, Dugar raised four enumerations of error, all relating to her waiver of a jury trial. But finding no error, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed Dugar’s conviction. View "Dugar v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Ruff v. Georgia
Tahj Ruff was convicted of felony murder and related crimes in connection with the shooting death of Lynwood Williams. Ruff appealed, but the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed Ruff’s convictions. The matter was remanded to the trial court, however, to correct the calculation of Ruff’s sentence. View "Ruff v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Mathews v. Georgia
Following a joint trial with co-defendant Shelton Jackson, Jarvis Mathews was convicted of felony murder, aggravated assault, and possessing a firearm during the commission of a felony for the 2001 fatal shooting of Grant Reynolds, and the non-fatal shootings of Larentae and Robert Mumphery. Finding no reversible error in the trial court judgment, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed. View "Mathews v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Harris v. Georgia
Juan Harris was convicted by jury of murder and related crimes in connection with the 2001 death of Tony Morris. On appeal, Harris argued the trial court should have granted him a continuance to call missing witnesses, and that his trial counsel was ineffective for reasons relating to witness preparations and for withdrawing requests for jury charges. Finding no reversible error, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed. View "Harris v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Wright v. Georgia
Shakur Wright pleaded guilty to the malice murder of Benjamin Thompson and to other related offenses. Ten days after sentencing, Wright, through new counsel, filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea. The motion was timely filed in the same term of court as his conviction. Wright argued that his plea counsel was ineffective for allegedly failing to inform him before sentencing of the more stringent “manifest injustice” standard for withdrawing a guilty plea after sentencing. After the court denied Wright’s motion, Wright appealed, arguing that his plea counsel’s alleged ineffective assistance resulted in an “unnecessary burden” on him. Finding no abuse of discretion in the superior court’s ruling, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed its order denying Wright’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea. View "Wright v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Phillips v. Jackson, et al.
A municipal court judge believed Carey Phillips’s traffic citation gave rise to “quasi-bond” conditions that it could — and did — modify in order to restrict Phillips’s driving privileges. Phillips disagreed, but instead of appealing the municipal court judge’s order, he sought pretrial habeas relief against the municipal court judge and the City of Atlanta Solicitor. Counsel for the respondents did not attempt to defend the judge’s order on the merits, arguing only that Phillips’s habeas petition was procedurally improper on several grounds. The habeas court denied relief, partly on the ground that Phillips had an adequate remedy at law and so could not seek habeas. To this the Georgia Supreme Court agreed and affirmed, though identifying a different legal remedy than did the habeas court. View "Phillips v. Jackson, et al." on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Moore v. Georgia
Nikita Moore appealed her conviction for malice murder arising out of the 2010 death of her two-year-old son, Ma’Kel Moore-Tompkins. On appeal, Moore claimed the circumstantial evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support her murder conviction because it failed to exclude every reasonable hypothesis other than her guilt. Finding no reversible error, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed Moore’s conviction. View "Moore v. Georgia" on Justia Law
Posted in:
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law